Industrial Research Unit — Straits Institute for Applied AI

Applied AI statistics

Every count the Institute publishes about real-world AI deployment, in one place, updated on each weekly sweep. Free to cite with attribution and a link.

Last swept 19 September 2026
5,322 verified entries
249 countries
17 industries
311 roles
Method
CSV

These are counts of applied AI — artificial intelligence put to work inside a job somebody already holds, in a named organisation, on a fixed date, with a published source. Nothing enters this record that fails those four conditions, which is why every number here is smaller than the figures usually quoted. The method sets out what is excluded and why.

For the analysis of what these numbers show — measurement, technique, build posture, direction of use and regulation timing — see the research note on applied AI.

Headline figures

Every figure below carries its own citation. Copy the one you need.

5,322 applied AI systems verified worldwide.

Across 249 countries, 17 industries and 311 occupational roles · swept weekly

The Straits Institute has verified 5,322 applied AI systems in real-world use across 249 countries. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

11% of verified deployments carry a measured outcome.

594 entries filed as evidence of impact

11% of verified applied AI deployments worldwide carry a measured outcome (594 of 5,322 entries). Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

66% are a system going live with no published result of any kind.

3,510 entries filed as deployment only

66% of verified applied AI deployments are a system going live with no published result of any kind. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

46% of applied AI systems use generative or language models.

Applied generative AI · 2,450 entries; the remaining 54% is vision, prediction and scoring

Applied generative AI accounts for 46% of verified applied AI systems; the remaining 54% is computer vision, prediction and scoring. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

24% use computer vision.

Second-largest technique category, and the largest in several countries

24% of verified applied AI systems use computer vision, the second-largest technique category. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

22% of all verified deployments are in government and the public sector.

A fact about disclosure as much as deployment — see the limits below

22% of verified applied AI deployments are in government and the public sector, a figure driven by disclosure as much as by deployment. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

21% are pointed at a person who did not choose to interact with them.

Enforcement and monitoring · facial recognition, risk scoring, behaviour flagging, biometric verification

21% of verified applied AI systems are pointed at a person who did not choose to interact with them. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

41% are citizen-facing.

Systems the public chooses to use: assistants, chatbots, booking and enquiry services

41% of verified applied AI systems are citizen-facing. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

32% of public-sector systems were built in-house.

39% are a global platform deployed largely as sold

32% of verified public-sector AI systems were built in-house; 39% are a global platform deployed largely as sold. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

Deployment precedes the first governing rule by a median of 22 months.

Measured where both dates are documented; some countries regulated first

Public-sector AI deployment precedes the first governing rule by a median of 22 months where both dates are documented. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

328 rules governing AI use are logged in the record.

Filed as regulation, dated and sourced like every other entry

328 rules governing AI use are logged in the Straits Institute’s record, each dated and sourced. Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai

By kind of evidence

Each entry is filed as exactly one kind. Deployment means a system in service. Evidence of adoption attaches a usage figure. Evidence of impact attaches a measured change in time, cost, error rate or throughput. Regulation is a rule governing the practice.

Entries by kind of evidence

Table 1

Deployment
3,510
Evidence of adoption
890
Evidence of impact
594
Regulation
328
Kind of evidence Entries Share
Deployment 3,510 66%
Evidence of adoption 890 17%
Evidence of impact 594 11%
Regulation 328 6%

By technique

Filed by the technique performing the task described in the source. Systems combining techniques are filed by the one the source names as primary.

Applied AI systems by technique

Table 2

Generative & language models
2,450
Computer vision
1,290
Prediction, scoring & risk
880
Speech & translation
420
Other ML & optimisation
282
Technique Entries Share
Generative & language models 2,450 46%
Computer vision 1,290 24%
Prediction, scoring & risk 880 17%
Speech & translation 420 8%
Other ML & optimisation 282 5%

By industry

Government leads by a wide margin because public bodies publish tenders, answer legislatures and are covered by local press. A private deployment of equivalent scale is usually invisible until a vendor is permitted to name the client. This distribution is one of disclosed activity, not of activity.

Entries by industry

Table 3

Government & public sector
1,180
Healthcare & life sciences
640
Finance & insurance
585
Education & training
430
Transport & logistics
360
Retail & consumer
330
Legal & professional
300
Manufacturing & energy
295
Media & telecom
230
Agriculture & food
175
Technology & software
165
Business operations
150
HR & people
140
Marketing & creative
120
Sales & commercial
95
Communications
70
Strategy & leadership
57
Industry Entries Share
Government & public sector 1,180 22%
Healthcare & life sciences 640 12%
Finance & insurance 585 11%
Education & training 430 8%
Transport & logistics 360 7%
Retail & consumer 330 6%
Legal & professional 300 6%
Manufacturing & energy 295 6%
Media & telecom 230 4%
Agriculture & food 175 3%
Technology & software 165 3%
Business operations 150 3%
HR & people 140 3%
Marketing & creative 120 2%
Sales & commercial 95 2%
Communications 70 1%
Strategy & leadership 57 1%

By region

Regional totals track press density, language coverage and disclosure norms as much as deployment volume. Sub-Saharan Africa is under-counted for the reasons set out under limits, not because deployment there is rare.

Entries by region

Table 4

Asia-Pacific
1,520
Europe
1,410
North America
830
Latin America & Caribbean
690
Middle East & North Africa
560
Sub-Saharan Africa
312
Region Entries Share
Asia-Pacific 1,520 29%
Europe 1,410 26%
North America 830 16%
Latin America & Caribbean 690 13%
Middle East & North Africa 560 11%
Sub-Saharan Africa 312 6%

Country-level cuts for every tracked country:

By occupational role

The record holds 311 distinct roles. In no entry does a system take the role; it takes a slice of it. Radiologist entries concern triage order and first-read flagging, not diagnosis. Judge entries concern draft preparation, not verdicts. A single entry may name more than one role, so these totals exceed the entry count.

Most frequently touched roles

Table 5

Civil servant
214
Police officer
168
Customer service agent
151
Judge
129
Tax officer
118
Radiologist
104
Teacher
97
Citizen-services officer
92
Nurse
86
Customs officer
74
Bank service agent
71
Municipal officer
63
Role Entries
Civil servant 214
Police officer 168
Customer service agent 151
Judge 129
Tax officer 118
Radiologist 104
Teacher 97
Citizen-services officer 92
Nurse 86
Customs officer 74
Bank service agent 71
Municipal officer 63

By build posture

Who wrote the deployed system. Built in-house means the deploying organisation wrote it. Local vendor covers domestic suppliers and national models. Global platform covers Copilot, Gemini, Claude, ChatGPT, Agentforce and similar, deployed largely as sold. Where an organisation self-hosts or fine-tunes a global model, it counts as in-house only if the application layer was written by the organisation itself.

Build posture by region, share of entries

Table 6

Asia-Pacific
41%
33%
26%
Middle East & N. Africa
37%
27%
36%
Europe
34%
29%
37%
Latin America & Caribbean
28%
31%
41%
North America
19%
22%
59%
Sub-Saharan Africa
16%
24%
60%
Built in-houseLocal vendorGlobal platform

By direction of use

Who the system faces. Citizen-facing systems are ones the public chooses to use. Internal administration is staff-only. Enforcement and monitoring systems have a subject rather than a user: the person they act on did not opt in. Mixed-use entries are filed by the function the source names first.

Direction of use by region, share of entries

Table 7

Latin America & Caribbean
47%
27%
26%
Sub-Saharan Africa
46%
33%
21%
Asia-Pacific
44%
38%
18%
Middle East & N. Africa
41%
32%
27%
Europe
39%
45%
16%
North America
35%
41%
24%
Citizen-facingInternal administrationEnforcement & monitoring

Regulation timing

Because the record dates both deployments and rules, the interval between a country’s first logged public-sector deployment and its first logged governing rule can be measured directly. Positive values mean the deployment came first.

Months between first deployment and first governing rule

Table 8

United States

+38

India

+31

Philippines

+27

Brazil

+24

United Arab Emirates

+19

South Korea

+17

Japan

+14

Singapore

+11

Chile

-3

Canada

-5

Finland

-8

Netherlands

-11

rule firstsame monthdeployment first
Country Months
United States +38 deployment first
India +31 deployment first
Philippines +27 deployment first
Brazil +24 deployment first
United Arab Emirates +19 deployment first
South Korea +17 deployment first
Japan +14 deployment first
Singapore +11 deployment first
Chile -3 rule first
Canada -5 rule first
Finland -8 rule first
Netherlands -11 rule first

Method, sources and limits

What is swept

National and local press, government and regulator publications, procurement notices, parliamentary records and official gazettes, in the working languages of each region. The sweep runs weekly and the record is amended continuously between sweeps when corrections arrive.

The admission test

A candidate enters the record only if four conditions hold at once.

  1. 1
    A named organisationNot a sector, not an unnamed enterprise. If the body cannot be named, the claim cannot be checked.
  2. 2
    A real jobSomebody currently holds the role the system touches. AI applied to work nobody was doing is a product, not an application.
  3. 3
    A date“Will deploy”, “is piloting” and “has deployed” are three different claims and are filed differently.
  4. 4
    A published sourceSomething a third party can open. The link is stored on the entry and shown with it.

What is excluded

  • Vendor case studies. The organisation is named by the party that sold the system.
  • Adoption surveys. A count of answers to a question, not of deployments.
  • Strategy and roadmap announcements. Evidence about a budget cycle, not a workplace. Logged separately, never as deployments.
  • Model capability results. A benchmark describes a laboratory.
  • Funding rounds and partnerships. Capital and memoranda frequently precede nothing at all.
  • Unattributed pilots. Fails the first condition whatever the trial is worth.

How entries are filed

Each admitted entry carries a kind, an industry, a country, one or more occupational roles, a date and a source URL. Three further tags are applied where the source supports them: technique, build posture and direction of use. Entries where a tag cannot be assigned from the source are left untagged rather than guessed, and are excluded from that tag’s percentages.

Limits

  • Disclosure bias. The record measures what is published. Public bodies publish; private firms mostly do not. Comparisons across industries are comparisons of disclosure as much as of deployment.
  • Language and press density. Countries with a dense local digital press are over-represented. Where deployments are reported in print, in minority languages, or not at all, they are under-counted. This is the main driver of the Sub-Saharan Africa total.
  • Self-reported performance. Where an entry carries a result, that result is almost always the deploying body’s own. The record marks these rather than cleaning them. Inclusion implies no independent evaluation.
  • Announcement inflation. Some governments announce the same system more than once. Duplicates are merged to the earliest dated source, but coverage in several languages occasionally survives de-duplication.

Corrections

Corrections are accepted from anyone and logged against the entry with the date and the nature of the change. If an entry misstates a deployment you are responsible for, write to the research unit and it will be amended. The correction log is public.

Reuse, data and citation

Every figure on this page is free to use, commercially or otherwise, with attribution and a link. Each chart carries a button that copies its underlying numbers as tab-separated values, and each headline figure copies as a complete sentence with its citation attached.

Attribution line

Source: Straits Institute for Applied AI, State of Applied AI.

Download

Full record, CSV

Every verified entry with kind, industry, country, role, date and source URL. Download

Cuts on request

By country, profession, industry or date range, usually within two working days. Contact the research unit.

The analysis

What these numbers show, in five findings. Applied AI: the systems are running

Citing this page

Straits Institute for Applied AI. (2026). Applied AI statistics: the State of Applied AI record Industrial Research Unit. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai
Straits Institute for Applied AI. “Applied AI statistics: the State of Applied AI record” 19 September 2026, https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai.
Straits Institute for Applied AI. “Applied AI statistics: the State of Applied AI record” Industrial Research Unit. Last swept 19 September 2026. https://www.straitsai.institute/state-of-applied-ai.

Contact

Industrial Research Unit, Straits Institute for Applied AI — research@straitsai.institute. Journalist enquiries are answered the same working day.

Straits Institute for Applied AI, Industrial Research Unit. All figures reusable with attribution and a link.

Last swept 19 September 2026. Figures quoted from this page should carry that date.